Kirill Kivattsev vs Aryan Shah Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Advantage: Kivattsev holds a marginal edge in second serve point wins, achieving 47.23% compared to Shah's 41.28% over the last six months. Does this suggest a higher likelihood of Kivattsev dominating rallies initiated by his second serve? Yes, given the strong correlation between this stat and match outcomes.
• Return Game Insights: Shah has slightly less effectiveness in returning second serves, capturing 45.4% of points, while Kivattsev secures 46.52%. For first serve returns, their stats are nearly identical with Shah at 25.38% and Kivattsev at 25.4%. This hints at a marginal edge for Kivattsev in return games.
• Breakpoint Resilience: Under pressure, Kivattsev demonstrates greater breakpoint resilience, saving 56.51% versus Shah's 47.84%. Could Kivattsev's stronger mental fortitude in critical points make a significant difference? Likely, especially in close sets.
• Overall Winning Record: Shah exhibits a slight advantage with a yearly match win rate of 62.5%, while Kivattsev clocks in at 60.27%. This suggests Shah may enjoy a small edge in overall match performance consistency.
• Surface Preferences: Shah performs best on indoor hard courts with a 67% win rate, while Kivattsev excels on grass at 75%. Their experience on hard surfaces suggests the surface could modestly favor Shah.
• Match Experience: Both players frequently compete in $10K level events, with Shah having a slightly higher win percentage (65.96%) compared to Kivattsev's 64.06%. How much does playing level affect match outcomes? It can hint at readiness and capability levels.
• Opponent Quality: Shah engages with slightly higher-ranked opponents (average rank of 443.3) than Kivattsev (465.78). This may indicate a marginally tougher competition routine for Shah.
• Deciding Set Performance: Shah excels in deciding sets, securing victory 64% of the time, whereas Kivattsev has a lower success rate at 45%. If the match extends this far, Shah's ability to close in crucial moments is promising.
• Breakpoint Conversion: Shah is more effective at converting breakpoint opportunities with a rate of 34.64%, topping Kivattsev's 31.45%, which could be pivotal in tight games.

Editorial Prediction (July 9, 2025, UTC):

In evaluating the head-to-head statistics of Shah and Kivattsev, distinct patterns emerge that affect their competitive edges. While Kivattsev shows prowess in second serve effectiveness and breakpoint defense, Shah commands a higher overall winning rate and excels in high-pressure deciding sets.

Their performance on different surfaces, with Shah favoring hard courts, could also influence the outcome, particularly if played on such a surface. Although Kivattsev has an advantage in specific metrics like second serve and return points, Shah's stronger breakpoint conversion and decisive set wins lean in his favor.

Given these considerations, Shah appears to have a slight edge in this upcoming matchup. His proficiency in converting crucial points and outperforming in tiebreaking scenarios may position him as the likely victor in this encounter. Therefore, Shah is predicted to win.